Speaking of Nursing
Homes
“I guess old Snodgrass
had the last laugh.” I told Lapius, after his uninspiring appearance
before the August body. “I don’t know if you were embarrassed, but actually he
practically asked you to sit down and be quiet.”
“Of course I was not
embarrassed,” Lapius fumed, “I expected nothing more from a man whose mind is
as arcane as the dark side of the moon.”
“So why did you go in
the first place?”
“Civic duty.”
“I really believe that
you meant that,” I said.
“Of course I mean that.
One of the terrible things that has happened to this country since the McCarthy
era is that people no longer speak out as individuals.”
“Come on, Simon,” I
chided, “actually everyone is speaking out. There is Woman’s Lib, union
leaders, the AMA, the AHA. Each has its spokesman.”
“Precisely my
point," Lapius said smugly. “People speak out only in groups or as
representatives of a crowd or a mob. They are afraid to speak
independently as individuals, representing their own point of view. First they find
a group that approximates things they believe in. Then safely within the
confines of the crowd, they speak. The McCarthy era. Charlie not
Joe.”
“Well, you saw what good
it did to present yourself at the August body and speak as an individual.”
“Yes. No good at
all. But it kindled satisfaction in my soul. Actually, there is a point
to be made. The fact is that nursing homes are medically wrong. In
the first place too many are substandard. Secondly patients cannot easily be examined
in these places, because there are usually no examining rooms and doctors must
see their patients in the confines of a semiprivate room. The beds are so
low that a sacroiliac sprain is the reward of a proper examination. The rooms are poorly lighted. There
isn’t enough help to properly position the patient. The records are
unkempt. The laboratory work is often disorganized. And the places
are not convenient for doctor visits.”
“What I was trying to
point out to the August body, was that the nursing home should best be handled
as a group practice. There should be an examining room or two, staffed by
trained nurses. A group of doctors should hold an outpatient clinic daily, so
that all patients can get immediate care for even minor complaints and not have
to wait until their doctor comes to see them.”
“You are getting into
dangerous ground there, Simon,” I said. “That would clearly interrupt the
doctor-patient relationship.”
“Of course. But
the doctor-patient relationship really applies to the younger age group.
We must not be deceived that this same relationship is as important to the very
old, crippled and senile in nursing homes as it is to the young family.
“In the first place,
residents of convalescent homes are already under domiciliary care.
Secondly, their medical problems have already been defined. Thirdly we
are not going to do major surgery on the 85 year old paralytic. We are just
trying to maintain him in comfort and dignity. Patients in convalescent
homes have multi-system diseases. Their bones are soft, their joints
ache, their hearts are distant, blindness of one degree or another accompanies
partial deafness. Each patient is a virtual clinic of diseases.
“Their family doctors
really don’t have time to run over to see them as often as their complaints
warrant. How much better off they would be with a doctor on premises for
a few hours a day so that there could be continuous care and reassurance.
It could easily be set-up.”
“You make a persuasive
argument, Simon. What is stopping it?”
“Probably the medical
society misguidedly trying to preserve the doctor-patient relationship.”
“But they should,
shouldn’t they?”
“Of course they
should. But in the larger arena, where it counts. The society feels
it is against their canons to institute a group practice in a convalescent
home, but on the other hand they support PSRO, and utilization review in
private practice, measures that are certain eventually to intrude into the
relationship between a family and its doctor.”
“You agree, then, that
the instinct to preserve the relationship between the patient and his doctor is
correct.”
“Of course the instinct
and purpose are correct. But they are being misapplied. A nursing
home is not really the best arena for private practice. It lends itself
in particular to the HMO concept. The ingredients are conventionally
gathered.”
“Maybe you are right,
Simon, but I am afraid that nobody will buy it.”
“Well, another
alternative would be to have at least one wing of every nursing home equipped
as a non-surgical hospital, so that patient’s ill in the nursing home part
could be moved to the wing to receive the benefits of hospital care. This
would add countless beds to the hospital system at much lower cost than those
in hospitals equipped for surgery. And if the hospital beds are empty, they can
be used for convalescent beds. In other words, take the rigidity out of
the system. Make it more pliable in response to the needs of the
community.”
“Sounds great Simon, but
who is going to listen to you?”
Lapius peered at me over
his bifocal lenses. “You listened, didn’t you?” he asked.