Patients Are People
Too
S.Q. Lapius was busy
reading and underlining, muttering to himself and uttering occasional
expletives.
“You sound vexed, Simon,
something must be amiss.”
“No, Harry. Just
studying the means by which doctors will be able to go on strike, or perhaps
forced to.”
“Go on strike?
Doctors? Clearly a breach of the medical tradition. What did you
do? Join a union or some such thing?”
“Not at all,
Harry. Simply studying the Accreditation Manual for Hospitals put out by
the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Hospitals, the JCAH, to be
brief.”
“What’s so revolutionary
about the manual? Surely it doesn’t preach revolution.”
“Of course not. It
simply details what doctors are supposed to do to maintain a viable medical
staff. Shall I quote?”
“If you must” I said,
laying aside the evening paper. It looked like I would be in for a long
night.
“All right, if you
insist. Quote: Because the overall responsibility for the quality of
medical practice rests with the medical staff, the individual staff member will
be held accountable for the appropriateness of care rendered to his
patients. Medical care evaluation should be a fact finding and
educational function. To accomplish such analysis effectively, criteria
for evaluating medical care must be established by the medical staff -.
Whatever the organizational pattern selected, the medical staff must provide an
appropriate peer group method by which the required basic functions of medical,
surgical and obstetrical audit are thoroughly performed at least monthly.
The tissue review should include an evaluation of tissue removed at
operation. Similar review should be performed with respect to those
situations in which no tissue was removed at the time of surgery. Medical
care evaluation shall include periodic review of the utilization of the bed
facilities and the diagnostic, nursing, and therapeutic resources of the
hospital, with respect to both the availability of resources to all patients in
accordance with their medical needs and the recognition of the medical
practitioner’s responsibility for the costs of health care. This review
should cover, on a sample or other basis, admissions, lengths of stay,
professional services furnished and the availability and alternate use of out-of-hospital
facilities for diagnosis and therapy should be reviewed. Minutes that
adequately reflect the transactions of the medical care evaluation shall be
kept etc. etc. etc. unquote.”
“So why are you going on
strike?” I asked.
“I’m not. I simply
have found the device whereby the physicians can appear to be on strike.
All they have to do is to follow the by-laws to the letter. To do this
each would have to spend about 20 hours from their practices performing these
chores. Suddenly the doctor shortage would become critical. Can you
imagine the hubbub if a patient tried to reach his doctor only to find that he
was busy auditing the work of other doctors, and spending his time trying to
find out if the community was properly served, and if the facilities were being
properly used?”
“It would cause a
scandal,” I admitted.
“Probably.
Certainly the patients would be better served if each doctor preserved his time
to practice medicine, follow the journals, continue his education at meetings
and post-graduate courses. After all I’ve never gone to a meeting that
wasn’t crowded. Sometimes there is standing room only. Before a
physician is admitted to the medical staff of a hospital he must be carefully
screened and his credentials validated.”
“But you are not really
against physicians policing themselves, are you Simon? As a matter of
fact you have always been the first to request the medical department to devote
more time to case review.”
“But we have always
policed ourselves. What is going on now is that the JCAH wants to
institute a medical audit that will select cases that have gone awry, and have
these scrutinized for the reason the patient didn’t do as well as he should
have.”
“Are you against
that? It sounds reasonable.”
“Not in principle.
But medicine and medical problems are immediate. It is very hard to
rehash them from the records, or to get a true picture of what was actually
happening at the moment. In my view the best medical surveillance should
occur while a patient is still in the hospital. Problem cases should be
brought to committee to get the collective wisdom of the department. In
that way the patient might be helped when he needs it most. Lumping of
cases leads to statistical evaluation, but medicine is too much an art to be
regulated entirely by statistics. The fact is I keep coming back to the
first line I quoted you.
‘Because the overall
responsibility for the quality of medical practice rests with the medical
staff…’ The important thing is that the quality of medical practice
within a hospital is to a great extent a function of the quality of the
hospital, the discipline of the nursing staff, the alertness and interest of
the pharmacist. To a great extent, the medical staff is powerless to
affect these matters because it is administered by the board of trustees who
hold legal power in a hospital. The board also, in most cases, maintains
the prerogative of hiring the pathologist and radiologist, two key personnel in
medical practice within a hospital. Can the medical staff be held
responsible for their proficiency in the practice of medicine? I think
what I object to is that the effect of these audit mandates always leaves the
impression with the public that it
requires policing…both of which are base canards.
“Secondly it leaves open
the question of who polices the hospital? In reality, the doctors have
little power to police the ecology of the hospital. If not they, who
then? The real point is that medicine is an individual problem, and if a
patient in the hospital is in trouble it is that patient at that moment who
should be the focus of attention by the doctors, nurses and
administration. Not months later from the devitalized medical records
just to provide the appearance of self policing.”
“Simon,” I laughed, “you
are an unreconstructed individualist.”
“Only because my
patients are individuals, Harry.”