Abortion Circa 1973
“Yes,
Tanner, I understand. I’ll be glad to
help.” Pause. “I must satisfy myself first that is the way she wants it, not
you or your wife, but your daughter.”
Pause again while Lapius hugged the receiver to his ear. “If she makes up her mind, I’ll make the
appropriate recommendation. Right. Goodbye.”
Lapius
hung up, moved a pawn and I removed his white bishop from the board with my
knight. “You can’t do that, Harry,” he
said, “come on, I was distracted by the phone call.”
“No
one forced your hand, Simon. A move is
a move. After all, Simon, it was you
who taught me that if the rules of chess are changed it no longer is chess but
another game.”
“I’m
afraid that’s true, Harry, and if the rules of life are changed it becomes
another game too, I guess.”
“Is
that what the call was all about?”
“Yes. Tanner has a teenager daughter who disclosed
at long last that she is four months pregnant.
At the moment she believes that she wants to abort the baby.”
“And
he wants you to refer her to an abortionist?”
“Quite
correct.”
“And
that depresses you and forces you to make errors on the chess board.”
“Precisely.”
“And
if the girl decides to have an abortion, you will refer her to an abortionist.”
“Yes.”
“Even
though the Supreme Court said that any woman had the right to an abortion
through the first trimester of pregnancy only.
You would be contravening the spirit of the law of the land, now, Simon. Not a comfortable posture for you.”
“The
whole thing is uncomfortable for me.
There is no doubt in my mind that abortion is the taking of a life
without due process. It is an assault
on a human life.”
“But
there are those who say that a fetus isn’t really alive. Its life is dependent on the umbilical ties
to the mother.”
“What
would you say to the same argument being applied to a human being whose life
depended on the tubes going into his veins from intravenous bottles, or
dialysis machines. I don’t think that
dependency and viability can be used as criteria.”
“Then,
according to you, life starts at conception.”
“I
would think so. The traditional belief
in our society is that life is initiated by conception. It is biologically reasonable.”
“Well,
if you feel that way, why will you recommend an abortionist for Tanner’s
daughter?”
“To
insure that she falls into the proper hands.
Four months is a treacherous time for abortion, and should be performed
by experienced doctors. If I don’t
help, she’ll get it done somewhere else, and it may not turn out too well.”
Lapius
suddenly appeared old. “I don’t
understand your reaction, Simon.” I
told him. “I’ve even heard you argue in
favor of abortion.”
“Never. I never argued in favor of abortion. I argued in favor of legalizing
abortion. There’s a difference.”
“The
distinction escapes me.”
“Of
course it would,” he said with acerbity.
“Only a few years ago it was impossible to have medically indicated
abortions performed in legitimate hospitals; and, at the same time, we were
called upon to salvage the human wreckage that resulted from illegal abortions
performed with knitting needles in the back rooms, kitchens, and cellars of the
city. I wanted to legalize abortion so
it could be performed in the proper facility by trained physicians. But I never favored it. I find headlines stating that one to two
million human lives will be destroyed by this method every year. Horrifying, to say the least.”
“Well,
it’s like the song says, Simon. You
can’t have one without the other. You
can’t have legalized abortion without the slaughter. A dilemma, isn’t it?”
“Yes
Harry, a tragic dilemma. Society has
two choices. Either to admit that we
are accessories to murder, or else take it upon ourselves to change the
definition of life, a definition which we have traditionally ascribed to the
word of God in order to relieve ourselves of the burdensome
responsibility. Suddenly our generation
is willing to assume the responsibility, and I’m not sure were up to it. It took thousands of years to get up the
courage of foolhardiness, whatever you call it, to challenge the traditional
definition of when life begins. Now it
will be decided by statute. But it
won’t stop at abortion. We are asked
daily to define legal definitions of death.
We may ultimately come to decide that any 60-year-old man who can no
longer find a job is legally dead.
Legalizing abortion will lead to the legalization of euthanasia. Can you contemplate a society where life or
death will be decided by some administrative board? No, Harry, I’m afraid that the recent decision by the Supreme
Court trifles with the time honored fundamental precept of society, namely,
reverence for life. At least that’s the
view of this representative of my generation.”
“Well,
Simon, there are those in my generation who feel that abortion and euthanasia
merely serve to weed out the population, so that we can live in greater
comfort. What would you say to that?”
Lapius
surveyed the chessboard. “It’s your
move, Harry.”