Better Way Through
Trust
Lapius demanded that the
cab let us out about a block from the house, “to get my circulation going,” he
explained. He was literally fuming. He resembled a dragon as he
stomped angrily on the icy walks, twin jets of frost spiraling from his
nostrils. As we entered the house he started to stumble and reach out for
support like a blind man.
“What happened," I
asked, trying to balance him. “Did the brandy go to your head?”
“Don’t be
ridiculous. It’s my eyeglasses,” I reached for my handkerchief and
polished the mist from his lenses. “There, that’s better,” he said.
It took him a few
minutes to divest himself of scarves, boots, sweaters, etc. with which he had
girded himself against the winter winds. “I think,” he said when he had
finished, “that I need another brandy to settle my temper.”
“Still stinging from
that argument with Dr. Hardline?” I asked.
Lapius laughed.
“Hardly. I’ve known Johnny for a long time. We have a go at each
other every so often. Keeps me on my toes. No. The problem is
that although I disagree with his tactics, I can’t disagree with his
position. The government is often quite predatory. It encourages
the private sector to develop a fine resource, then gobbles it up. But
what is worse, in the gobbling, prevents the resource from being expanded and
refined. After all, the trust it has placed in the profession of medicine
as well as the pharmaceutical industry has paid off handsomely. Sure it
subsidized some areas but the fact is that the medical profession has exquisite
tools with which to fight disease, and the pharmaceutical industry has come up
with remarkable medications that afford a longer and happier life (medically
speaking) for many of our people. The fact that much of this is beyond
the financial resources of many is not the fault of either the profession or
the industry, but of the economic system. It seems unfair to attack
medicine and the pharmaceutical industry for something that is the fault of the
government itself.”
“Sure is a problem,” I
said hopefully.
“But not insoluble,”
said Lapius ignoring the irony. I had poured him a small liqueur, hoping
that after the brandy, he had consumed, the sweet drink would put him to sleep
so I could watch a fight on TV, but I had, as always, under-estimated his
capacity.
“The problem is, Harry,”
Lapius continued, disregarding my television commitment, “that the government
has mounted a vicious attack on the medical profession, using the proposed
regulations to subvert the image of the doctor in the eyes of the public.
They have done much the same to the pharmaceutical industry. It is one
thing to propose corrective legislation, but quite another to demand
utilization review, and to require that before a doctor can admit a patient to
a hospital the reason for admission must be screened by committee. This
places in the mind of the public the proposition that no doctor can be
trusted. That he keeps patients in hospitals too long in order to line
his own pocket. They have by these tactics, undermined the people’s faith
in the medical profession. They attack our probity and ethic by so-called
remedial laws. Yet individually they trust us enough to come to us when
they are ill. The pharmaceutical industry has played a large role in
health improvement, yet it too is under attack. If the pharmaceutical companies
can’t earn money to plow back into research, the research will stop, and the
system will groan to a halt.”
“Well,” I interjected,
in order to give him time to sip the liqueur, “whom the gods would destroy they
first make crazy,”
“The quotation, Harry,
is, ‘Whom God wishes to destroy He first deprives of reason,’ ascribed to
Euripides.”
“Well, you know what I
mean,” I said lamely.
“That’s neither here nor
there, Harry. The fact is that the government could solve a lot of its
problems if it would stop being so suspicious. Not worry about
utilization so much, but proceed on the certain knowledge that no patient wants
to stay in a hospital longer than necessary.”
“But we have a hospital
bed shortage.”
“Then build more
hospitals.”
“But that’s expensive.”
“Everything is
expensive. Look how expensive it is to set up bureaucratic watchdog
agencies. They could use that money for better purposes.”
“How?”
“Simple. If I have
a chronically ill patient at home who, because of the illness and nursing
needs, is becoming a burden to the family, why can’t I call an agency,
recommend that they pay for a nurse or homemaker, and have it done pronto.”
“That’s childish,
Simon. Look how much chiseling and kickback there could be.”
True, it might cost a
billion in chiseling, but this way they lose a billion in surveillance.
Let’s make a swap. My way would create more jobs, give the doctor more
flexibility in dealing with difficult social problems. Place the
responsibility for the care of the elderly or family who would accept the
responsibility, if only they could get some assistance. You say I am
childish. Of course, I am. The problem is that we have been
behaving as adults. Creating slick systems that stifle our initiative to
get things done and to help people. What we need is a return to childhood
innocence, where a direct problem is met directly, where a well of trust
exists.”
“Ha,” I laughed.
“You want everyone to trust each other. That is a laugh.”
“It is nothing to laugh
about. If someone has an accident they are invariably picked up out of
the road by a first aid squad, people who voluntarily place themselves on call
24 hours a day to help their neighbors in the community. They are a
Godsend, particularly for the unfortunate person who suddenly finds himself
tangled in the wreck of a car. The government now wants to
professionalize them, and to do this suggests that the first aid volunteers do
not know enough about resuscitation, cardiac arrest, internal injuries, and
what have you. The direct inference to the public is that you can’t trust
this remarkable person who volunteers to help you when you are in
trouble. I construe the whole thing as an unwarranted and vicious
attack. There must be a better way to improve health services than to
attack the people who established them in the first place.”
“I am sure you have a
suggestion to offer.”
“As a matter of fact I
do, Harry. There must be a return to the basic tenets of the founding
fathers, that in the long run the divergent interests of a free society will
balance out for the common good. In order for people to have faith in its
government, the government must have faith in its people. Get me some
more of that delectable potion, Harry.”
“Do you trust me,
Simon?”
“Implicitly, Harry.”
“You’ve had too much to
drink. Go to bed.”
“Nonsense,” said Lapius,
as he struggled from his chair to refill his glass, I’ll snooze here.”